Shriram Krishnamurthi at Brown wrote today about his pivot
into CS education research. I found the whole article fascinating to
read, but found this paragraph at the end intriguing as I am thinking
about my research agenda over the next few years:
When I became a professor, I decided it would be good to take on
“five-year plans”: pick a topic and work with it for about five years
(with a trailing year or two to disseminate results). That’s long enough
to really get into its guts, understand it at depth, make real
contributions, but also not become stale. (And most of all, not become
too attached to my insider status, which would breed conservatively
sticking to it and cranking out papers with rapidly diminishing
returns.) I’ve done that now on five projects, and it’s worked well for
me. This would be my sixth five-year project. In some ways, this is the
most terrifying one because it’s the one I’m least prepared for: when I
read @markguzdial’s writings, I feel I’m not just a novice, I’m trying
to reach a different planet. But I’ve muddled through before, and I’m
excited to try doing so again.
We talk about 5-year plans a lot in academia; forming one is common
advice to new faculty. But I think this is the first time that I have
seen the suggestion of thinking of a career as a sequence of 5-year
plans that don’t necessarily all focus on the same agenda.
I’ll be thinking about this as I work on my 5-year plan.